Results of the Study

Despite the lack of resources and the tight schedule we found altogether 55 cases of already logged areas or areas with current logging plans that clearly did not take into account the biological, social or cultural value of the areas in question. It is obvious that a more thorough study would have revealed an even grimmer reality.

Within the studied Forestry Centres in eastern and northern Finland we found 32 examples of old-growth forest logging and logging plans.

In northernmost Lapland (the Sámi area) there are also examples of the conflicting intrests between forestry and reindeer herding. Reindeer herding is an important part of the culture of the indigenous Sámi people. There are also conflicts regarding land ownership in the Sámi area (see the chapter Conflicts between forestry and reindeer herding in the Sámi area later in this web site for more information).

In North Karelia we found two examples of old-growth forest logging. We also found four cases of violations of the ecological FFCS certification criteria in managed forests. They are presented in this report as examples of the generally poor implementation of the certification criteria. A comprehensive list of the types of criteria violations that independent certifiers have revealed in each Forestry Centre can be found in appendix 3.

In Pirkanmaa we found ten examples of logging in forests of high conservation value.

Our research efforts concentrated on five Forestry Centres. However, during the field work we received information on past logging and current logging plans in forests of high conservation value as well as violations of the FFCS certification from four other Forestry Centres as well. There were altogether nine such cases from the four Forestry Centres and they are also presented in this report.

NEXT: Conclusions